Saturday 6 April 2013

The effectiveness of county government


THE COUNTY GOVERNMENT FAILURE
BY  LUKE KAPCHANGA

Residents of Bungoma county should start asking themselves if the county government will be effective?
History shows that government initiated projects in the county collapse basically on poor management in collusion with political machinations.
As the country gears itself for the implementation of the constitution, by introducing a devolved system of government, what is being peddled around is about who to hold which position only.
The basis for declaring interest for this positions is attached on account of having served in government through appointment in one way or the other.
And Bungoma is no exception , with county political elites lining  up those they can work with through  alliances with very narrow interests strategizing  on getting hold of power in the new political dispensation.
If the concern for effective governance is not addressed now, then the county may be among those to be the first to experience National government intervention.
The constitution in article 190(4b), authorizes the national government , if necessary , to assume the responsibility for relevant functions.
Why should this be?
Brief history of Bungoma can shade some light – the trend of development right from independence .
Its widely acknowledged  that the first African to hold the current equivalent of Bungoma county council chairman, Pascal Nabwana  put in place  structures  for development which remain unrivalled .
Being a selfless leader he hold the post from 1959 – 1963, was the brain behind the Bukusu welfare association which  was the vehicle through which the late veteran politician Masinde Muliro got his education..
He marshaled the community to get its own district from North Kavirondo, Bungoma had a vibrant cooperative movement , putting it on the Kenyan map for economic and educational sector.
With independence and Nabwan out of the way, the political leadership started dismantling everything he stood for, and poverty became a permanent feature .
It was Masined Muliro, who destroyed the Welfare association, which apart from playing a pivotal role for his education , and a vehicle for development and in its place espoused the Luyia unity.
With that very action, community members were almost criminalized  while coming up with development initiatives aimed at poverty alleviation..
On their part, the political elites developed a systemic agenda of mass scale poverty creation, by ensuring that institutions of employment and job creation collapse.
When, the Late Elijah Wasike Mwangale, trod the political scene like a colossus, the economic fortunes of the region sunk deeper.
The advent of multi- party had a foothold in Bungoma for a very simple reason, the residents were told and believed that, their suffering was because of poor leadership, then with the stewardship of Mwangale.
With Bungoma enjoying fanaticall support of the then opposition against KANU, new breed of leaders amongst them Musikari Kombo and Mukhisa Kituyi , got the chance as representatives.
With time, the two had the privilege of getting cabinet appointments, and true to the politics of Bungoma they too became strangers to the people they were supposed to represent , and any effort to change  economic dynamics remained elusive.

Poverty in Bungoma gained momentum during the days of Ford-Kenya enjoying political supremacy   and the district had the distinction as a Millennium district.
Which meant that the proportion of poverty was very high, and it required to be used as a trail centre ,every time the Millennium Development Goals are carried out.
Finding it self  in the Millennium category has not embarrassed the leadership, when all civil society movements across the country find the excuse  to hold a workshop of sorts there.
This brings me to getting worried why the National government will have reason to intervene in the Bungoma county government in relation to its functions and powers.
When you analyze the functions and powers of the county government in agriculture, control of pollution, trade development and regulations, and ensuring and coordinating participation in governance , you get scared, with the people jostling for the positions.
On agriculture , the sector accounts for almost 90% of the poverty being felt in Bungoma, yet it has all the potential to be the engine of growth.
The cooperative movement, Malakisi ginnery,, Kitinda dairy,Nzoia sugar company, have all had the strong involvement  of political leaders while management was almost entirely in the hands of daughters and sons of the county.
The same institutions have created a perfect environment for the spiraling suffering of the residents making them “begging farmers” .
This is so, because the elected leaders , develop a tendency of political tourist , and have no economic attachment to understand the suffering of  the people , what they go through, and the possible solution.
Take the case of Nzoia with a debt portfolio of shs.26 billion, against asset value of shs.8billion, is insolvent, yet management top brass is composed of sons of the county.
Nzoia is the only sugar factory under paying farmers for delivered crop at shs.3,300 per ton, while other millers are paying above shs.3,800, and the political class has not raised any finger.
Overall, corruption at the mill is at all times high, and there is no department , where outright theft is absent, creating more suffering for the farmers.
On pollution, before the closure of Pan African Paper mills, residents – without any support of political leadership sought the intervention of International Finance Cooperation- who were one of the big lenders to come to  their rescue on pollution related concerns.
For years, the political class were in the good books of the company executives, when residents of mainly Webuye, bore the impact of pollution related effects, without recourse.
With trade, it remains a laughable affair, as no local owns a business employing more than 5 people who are from outside the county .
All meaningful businesses are run successfully by what locals call outsiders, and the elites from the community find it very difficult to spot an investment opportunity.

The only  majority businesses  run by local  are investment in the hotel industry- yet the popular menu is alcohol .
The category of the hotels caters mostly for local tastes, as it can not compare with the set standards, when you take remarks by cooperative minister Joseph Nyagah, who said that Bungoma has no hotel he could sleep in.
The very same elites, do not know other promising opportunities, and hence do not know who is investing where, the returns and likely impact  on the economy- this spells a disaster if they are given the mandate of running the show of development.
The best case study for this purpose is the CDF, the infrastructure in general are billed not to last at most not more than ten years, yet they are the yard stick of development for most of the serving politicians in their respective constituencies.
The political elites in Bungoma are scared of the people to be involved in governance and are happy to have the monopoly of ideas to gives directives without contradictions.
And this same people can not be entrusted with  ensuring and coordinating the participation of communities for participation in governance at the local level.
The take the case were everyone who is everybody somewhere, declaring the need to contest which seat, is a clear indicator that poverty alleviation is not part of the agenda.
The forums, which these very leaders use to declare their interests, the discussions are about the revival of collapsed industries- manifesting closed thinking and lack of innovations in their style of leadership.
The leadership therefore, is about wanting to share posts, and quietly retread to the safety of  Nairobi, and occasionally make technical appearance in functions and funerals to fulfill their egos.